[PATCH] Update libvterm to version 0.1.1

DoneSubmitted by HiPhish.
Details
2 participants
  • HiPhish
  • Ricardo Wurmus
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
H
H
HiPhish wrote on 18 Sep 2019 21:40
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
20647564.kr67RFdfiE@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740
This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1 has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new release fixes Neovim as well in the process.
Toggle diff (22 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/terminals.scm b/gnu/packages/terminals.scmindex 98ed77289a..9cf3db8b7f 100644--- a/gnu/packages/terminals.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/terminals.scm@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ should be thread-safe.") (define-public libvterm (package (name "libvterm")- (version "0.1")+ (version "0.1.1") (source (origin (method url-fetch)@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ should be thread-safe.") "libvterm-" version ".tar.gz")) (sha256 (base32- "1pcxjhvdwhr2f3lyzf2rv1vp3l62bgkjm1ybhj82qf8yly7ca6g4"))))+ "1n5maylann2anfifjy576vzyar9q5m1kzpyiz2hca2pacxy8xf4v")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:make-flags
R
R
Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 18 Sep 2019 23:00
(name . HiPhish)(address . hiphish@posteo.de)(address . 37451@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k1a5nwun.fsf@elephly.net
Hi HiPhish,
Toggle quote (4 lines)> This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1> has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new> release fixes Neovim as well in the process.
thank you for this diff!
I’d like to attribute this patch to you, but you’ve sent a diff (not theoutput of “git format-patch -1” after a commit) which doesn’t containauthorship information. I would write a commit summary according to ourconventions, but I’d need to know with what name and email address youwould like to appear as the author.
--Ricardo
R
R
Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 18 Sep 2019 23:42
(name . HiPhish)(address . hiphish@posteo.de)(address . 37451-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87imppnuxc.fsf@elephly.net
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
Toggle quote (14 lines)> Hi HiPhish,>>> This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1>> has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new>> release fixes Neovim as well in the process.>> thank you for this diff!>> I’d like to attribute this patch to you, but you’ve sent a diff (not the> output of “git format-patch -1” after a commit) which doesn’t contain> authorship information. I would write a commit summary according to our> conventions, but I’d need to know with what name and email address you> would like to appear as the author.
Thanks for sending me the output of “git format-patch” off-list. Itwasn’t *quite* the format I expected, so I made a few minor changes tothe commit message and pushed it to the master branch (see commitb48d77fcf6).
Oh, before that I re-enabled the tests, because they work now. Yay!
Thanks again!
--Ricardo
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 37451@debbugs.gnu.org