[PATCH] Fix guile-fibers resource leak

Caleb Ristvedt wrote on 22 May 03:52 +0200

Recipients:(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87zha0zqft.fsf@cune.org

This adds a patch to guile-fibers to fix a resource leak that causedfile descriptors to be opened and never closed with each invocation of`run-fibers'.  This is presumably what was causing the tests to fail, asguile will abort when it gets EMFILE while attempting to create a newthread.  I've verified that it builds on my system, but it's only a4-core machine, and the rate at which file descriptors leak scales withthe number of cores, so it's possible it would have built successfullyhere regardless.  Could someone with access to a system with more coresverify that it now builds properly there?
Hopefully a bug fix release will show up soon enough and we can get ridof this.
- reepca

From 659fa6b70cb8364187753e240076cdb107320070 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: Caleb Ristvedt <caleb.ristvedt@cune.org>Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 20:30:58 -0500Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-fibers: Add patch to fix resource leak.
guile-fibers@1.0.0 has a resource leak where run-fibers will only destroy onescheduler, but it creates as many as there are cpu cores by default (seehttps://github.com/wingo/fibers/issues/36). This causes the tests to fail onsystems with many cores, and can cause guile to crash under certaincircumstances.  This fixes that resource leak.  At present neither git masternor the latest release has fixed this yet.
* gnu/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch: new patch.* gnu/local.mk: add it to the list of patches.* gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-fibers): use it.--- gnu/local.mk                                  |  1 + gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm                    |  5 +++- ...guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch

Toggle diff (60 lines)diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mkindex 1d9de9a57e..2f24f892b1 100644--- a/gnu/local.mk+++ b/gnu/local.mk@@ -1053,6 +1053,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA =						\   %D%/packages/patches/guile-3.0-relocatable.patch		\   %D%/packages/patches/guile-linux-syscalls.patch		\   %D%/packages/patches/guile-3.0-linux-syscalls.patch		\+  %D%/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch \   %D%/packages/patches/guile-gdbm-ffi-support-gdbm-1.14.patch	\   %D%/packages/patches/guile-present-coding.patch		\   %D%/packages/patches/guile-rsvg-pkgconfig.patch		\diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scmindex 674b1f922b..a1deee32d1 100644--- a/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm@@ -523,7 +523,10 @@ Unix-style DSV format and RFC 4180 format.")                     (("#:use-module \\(fibers\\)")                      (string-append "#:use-module (fibers)\n"                                     "#:use-module (ice-9 threads)\n")))-                  #t))))+                  #t))+              (patches+               ;; fixes a resource leak that causes crashes in the tests+               (search-patches "guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch"))))     (build-system gnu-build-system)     (arguments      '(;; The code uses 'scm_t_uint64' et al., which are deprecated in 3.0.diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patchnew file mode 100644index 0000000000..8bb7153153--- /dev/null+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/guile-fibers-destroy-peer-schedulers.patch@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@+Fibers 1.0.0 has a bug in run-fibers in which peer schedulers aren't destroyed -+so if you had 4 cores, 1 would be destroyed when run-fibers returned, but the+other 3 would stay around.  Each scheduler uses 3 file descriptors, so for+machines with many cores, this resource leak adds up quickly - quickly enough+that the test suite can even fail because of it.++See https://github.com/wingo/fibers/issues/36.++This fixes that.  It should be safe to destroy the peer schedulers at the given+point because the threads that could be running them are all either dead or the+current thread.++As of May 21, 2020, this bug still existed in the 1.0.0 (latest) release and in+git master.+--- a/fibers.scm	2020-05-21 18:38:06.890690154 -0500++++ b/fibers.scm	2020-05-21 18:38:56.395686693 -0500+@@ -137,5 +137,6 @@+              (%run-fibers scheduler hz finished? affinity))+            (lambda ()+              (stop-auxiliary-threads scheduler)))))++      (for-each destroy-scheduler (scheduler-remote-peers scheduler))+       (destroy-scheduler scheduler)+       (apply values (atomic-box-ref ret))))))+-- 2.26.2

Christopher Baines wrote on 22 May 19:44 +0200

Recipients:

Message-ID:87eerbc19g.fsf@cbaines.net

Caleb Ristvedt <caleb.ristvedt@cune.org> writes:

Toggle quote (10 lines)> This adds a patch to guile-fibers to fix a resource leak that caused> file descriptors to be opened and never closed with each invocation of> `run-fibers'.  This is presumably what was causing the tests to fail, as> guile will abort when it gets EMFILE while attempting to create a new> thread.  I've verified that it builds on my system, but it's only a> 4-core machine, and the rate at which file descriptors leak scales with> the number of cores, so it's possible it would have built successfully> here regardless.  Could someone with access to a system with more cores> verify that it now builds properly there?

I've tried this on bayfront.guix.gnu.org which has 32 cores and I'm veryglad to say it seems to work!
Maybe tweak the capitalisation in the commit message, "New patch", "Addit ...", "Use it", but yeah, I'm all for merging this, with it I'll beable to reconfigure bayfront hopefully. Are you set to tweak the commitmessage and push?
Thanks,
Chris

Caleb Ristvedt wrote on 22 May 21:38 +0200

Recipients:(name . Christopher Baines)(address . mail@cbaines.net)(address . 41444@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87tv07zrnh.fsf@cune.org

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> I've tried this on bayfront.guix.gnu.org which has 32 cores and I'm very> glad to say it seems to work!

Excellent.

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> Maybe tweak the capitalisation in the commit message, "New patch", "Add> it ...", "Use it",

Done.

Toggle quote (2 lines)

> Are you set to tweak the commit message and push?

Indeed, tweaked and pushed as 9af90aafdfd8afd5fb7b5377ca5daf2215d38d7a.
- reepca

Caleb Ristvedt wrote on 22 May 21:39 +0200

done

Recipients:(address . 41444-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87pnavzrmj.fsf@cune.org

closed.

Closed

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date