From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 26 03:12:48 2016 Received: (at 22883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2016 07:12:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auxAu-0001fV-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:12:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auxAs-0001fJ-Do for 22883@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:12:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auxAh-000414-WA for 22883@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:12:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auxAh-000410-T7; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:12:35 -0400 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:35456 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1auxAg-0005KC-NH; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:12:35 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: "Thompson\, David" Subject: Re: bug#22883: Trustable "guix pull" References: <87io14sqoa.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87h9ep8gxk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160426001359.GA23088@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:12:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: (David Thompson's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:17:21 -0400") Message-ID: <8760v4268v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22883 Cc: 22883@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) Hello! "Thompson, David" skribis: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> I think it's common to make minor edits when committing on behalf of >> others. For example, the committer might clean up a commit message or >> standardize indentation. >> >> How should we handle this? > > You would sign the commit yourself if you are committing on behalf of > someone else. Right. The (minor) issue I was referring to arises when one committer massages signed commits from another committer. Ludo=E2=80=99.