From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 16 05:45:00 2019 Received: (at 36924) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2019 09:45:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9nZ6-0008PF-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:45:00 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9nZ4-0008P7-Pi for 36924@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:44:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172AEDC4A; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:44:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUuMCXZo_mEA; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:44:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:660:6102:310:57eb:9f1c:5906:299]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA36EDB56; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:44:54 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36924: Mesa/GDM/XFCE Message-ID: <20190916094454.GA1265@jurong> References: <87tvawzlvq.fsf@elephly.net> <20190912095430.GA1559@jurong> <874l1hpwti.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <874l1hpwti.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36924 Cc: 36924@debbugs.gnu.org, L p R n d n X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Hello, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:40:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Thanks for the report, Andreas! and thanks for the time spent putting me on the good track! > Andreas Enge skribis: > > xfwm4: ../mesa-19.1.4/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c:1293: intel_miptree_match_image: Zusicherung »image->TexObject->Target == mt->target« nicht erfüllt. > That’s the likely root cause to me (in which case it may be unrelated to > this , after all.) > I found these bug reports: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107117 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678334 > > In both cases, Xfce and Mesa’s i965 drivers are involved, as is the case > on your machine. The 2nd bug report includes an xfwm4 patch, even. The first one also contains a patch, but it has been integrated into later mesa releases, in particular the one we are using. > I wonder if Xfce before the recent updates (so before > 8549e0ca6fd68a57253471436de49b88b2d47e64) works better. > Andreas, if you feel like it, could you try: > guix pull --commit=97ce5964fb5d52cf2151fea685e28fa23a98b264 > sudo guix system reconfigure … Indeed, the problem disappears with this commit; I can log in and out and in again with xfce working. So I am cc-ing the author of the commits updating xfce, maybe they have an answer! And I will try to look at the patch in the second report you reference above. Thanks! Andreas