From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 17 17:01:06 2020 Received: (at 40680) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2020 21:01:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPY6k-0000EF-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:01:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35198) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPY6j-0000Dd-Kt for 40680@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:01:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPY6d-0006xM-Pz; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:00:59 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=53502 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jPY6Y-0002Ni-CW; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:00:59 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [bug#40680] [PATCH] service: sddm: Have sddm-service-type conflict with other display managers. References: <20200417144115.2475-1-efraim@flashner.co.il> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:00:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200417144115.2475-1-efraim@flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:41:15 +0300") Message-ID: <87r1wlaku6.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40680 Cc: 40680@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner skribis: > * gnu/services/sddm.scm (sddm-shepherd-service)[shepherd-service]: > Conflict with 'xorg-server. > --- > > I was looking over the services list with raingloom on IRC and I noticed > that GDM and Slim both provision xorg-server, while SDDM provisions > display-manager. To ensure that they conflict with each other we can > either: > > A: Have SDDM conflict with 'xorg-server > > B: Have SDDM also provision 'xorg-server > > I'm currently using SDDM (in Wayland mode) to launch an X session of > Enlightenment, so I think it's safe enough to say that SDDM can > provision 'xorg-server. > > --- > > gnu/services/sddm.scm | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/services/sddm.scm b/gnu/services/sddm.scm > index 1921afce95..aa08859513 100644 > --- a/gnu/services/sddm.scm > +++ b/gnu/services/sddm.scm > @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ Relogin=3D" (if (sddm-configuration-relo= gin? config) > (documentation "SDDM display manager.") > (requirement '(user-processes)) > (provision '(display-manager)) > + (conflicts-with '(xorg-server)) =E2=80=98conflicts-with=E2=80=99 doesn=E2=80=99t exist, right? :-) But yes, I think (provision '(xorg-server display-manager)) would be fine. Or we can even drop =E2=80=98display-manager=E2=80=99 since it=E2=80=99s no= t used anywhere else. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.