Hi Leo, Leo Prikler skribis: > it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 and > some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group, > which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the same > definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from > using a hard error for #45770. > > I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group from > cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds > particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical > duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but that > sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve this? I’d be pragmatic here: 1. Ignore duplicates that are identical (don’t report them). 2. Remove “lp” from %base-groups since it has no use without CUPS (right?). Thanks, Ludo’.