[PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.

DoneSubmitted by Leo Famulari.
Details
3 participants
  • Brice Waegeneire
  • Jonathan Brielmaier
  • Leo Famulari
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 28 Jan 23:26 +0100
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
1ca6544af3d10a72d2c6a6c7d7a12b67d887e104.1580250411.git.leo@famulari.name
* gnu/system.scm (%base-packages): Add btrfs-progs.--- gnu/system.scm | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Toggle diff (16 lines)diff --git a/gnu/system.scm b/gnu/system.scmindex 01baa248a2..7cb6bef99d 100644--- a/gnu/system.scm+++ b/gnu/system.scm@@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ of PROVENANCE-SERVICE-TYPE to its services." ;; already depends on it anyway. kmod eudev - e2fsprogs kbd+ btrfs-progs e2fsprogs+ kbd bash-completion -- 2.25.0
J
J
Jonathan Brielmaier wrote on 28 Jan 23:42 +0100
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
47a29486-a557-b7f5-645b-382b39eee571@web.de
On 28.01.20 23:26, Leo Famulari wrote:
Toggle quote (2 lines)> * gnu/system.scm (%base-packages): Add btrfs-progs.
This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need btrfssupport here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apartfrom *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 29 Jan 00:14 +0100
(name . Jonathan Brielmaier)(address . jonathan.brielmaier@web.de)(address . 39332@debbugs.gnu.org)
20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:
Toggle quote (5 lines)> This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of> 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need btrfs> support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart> from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.
Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's justme. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.
B
B
Brice Waegeneire wrote on 29 Jan 12:19 +0100
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
bb3bdaeccbfbb11aecd6a5ce124c9b7e@waegenei.re
On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote:
Toggle quote (11 lines)> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:>> This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of>> 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need >> btrfs>> support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart>> from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.> > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's > just> me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.
Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't the case as I recall.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 8 Feb 01:21 +0100
(name . Brice Waegeneire)(address . brice@waegenei.re)(address . 39332-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
20200208002145.GE12194@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:19:18AM +0000, Brice Waegeneire wrote:
Toggle quote (15 lines)> On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote:> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:> > > This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of> > > 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need> > > btrfs> > > support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart> > > from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.> > > > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's just> > me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.> > Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be> added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't> the case as I recall.
You're right, that's a much better idea!
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 39332@debbugs.gnu.org